top of page
Search

๐๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐’๐œ๐จ๐จ๐ฉ ๐“๐š๐ค๐ž ๐จ๐ง ๐Œ๐š๐ซ๐ข๐จโ€™๐ฌ ๐ˆ๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐ž๐ฐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐๐š๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐Š๐š๐ ๐š๐ฆ๐ž

  • Writer: PoliScoop
    PoliScoop
  • Mar 12
  • 2 min read

In an era where mainstream media often prioritizes sensationalism over substance, Mario Nawfalโ€™s 69-minute interview with President PaulKagame stands out as an exemple of what journalism couldโ€”and shouldโ€”be.


Titled with a playful nod to its runtime, this conversation is anything but frivolous. Itโ€™s a deep dive into the complexities of the Congo crisis, Rwandaโ€™s role in the region, and the broader dynamics of global power that shape Africaโ€™s narrative. For once, we have an interviewer who doesnโ€™t approach an African leader with ๐€๐‘๐‘๐Ž๐†๐€๐๐‚๐„, preconceived notions or a hidden agenda, but instead with a genuine intent to listen, learn, and understand.


The interview comes at a time when Kagameโ€™s name is frequently splashed across headlines, often painted with the broad brush of lies or complicity in the Democratic Republic of Congoโ€™s turmoil.

Critics argue that Nawfalโ€™s willingness to hear Kagameโ€™s perspective somehow taints his credibility, branding him as corrupt simply for giving a platform to a controversial figure.


Yet this criticism misses the point entirely. What Nawfal achieves in this 69-minute exchange is a rare feat: he allows Kagame to speak for himself, unfiltered and uninterrupted, offering a counterpoint to the dominant narrative that international media so often distorts.


๐‚๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐š๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐‚๐๐โ€™๐ฌ ๐ซ๐ž๐œ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐ž๐ฐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐Š๐š๐ ๐š๐ฆ๐ž where hours of discussion were boiled down to a one-minute clip, carefully edited to fit a preconceived storyline. Thatโ€™s the mainstream media playbookโ€”twist words, cherry-pick soundbites, and drown out nuance with noise. Yet they did not say CNN is bought by Tshisekedi ( which by the way might be the case)


Mario Nawfal , however, flips the script. Thereโ€™s no arrogance in his demeanor, no disrespectful interruptions, no assumptions masquerading as questions. He sits across from Kagame not as a judge, but as a student of the situation, eager to peel back the layers of a conflict too often reduced to simplistic headlines. This is what journalism lacks today: the humility to let the subject breathe and the courage to let the audience draw their own conclusions.


President Kagame, for his part, seizes the opportunity. He doesnโ€™t shy away from the tough questionsโ€”about Rwandaโ€™s alleged involvement in Congo, the Westโ€™s double standards, or the United Nationsโ€™ failures. He speaks with the conviction of a leader who knows his story has been sidelined, laying bare the power struggles that keep Congo in chaos and the foreign hands that profit from its mineral wealth.


Whether you agree with him or not, thereโ€™s no denying the value of hearing his unvarnished perspective, free from the editorial scalpel of outlets more interested in clicks than clarity.


Marioโ€™s approach is a masterclass in media done right. He doesnโ€™t posture as an all-knowing arbiter of truth; he facilitates a conversation. He respects Kagame not just as a president, but as a voice that deserves to be heardโ€”an African leader too often spoken over by those who claim to speak for him. In a world where mainstream media thrives on distortion and division, this interview is a refreshing reminder of whatโ€™s possible when someone dares to listen. For 69 minutes, weโ€™re given a window into a side of the story thatโ€™s been buried under biasโ€”and that, in itself, is revolutionary.

Big up to Mario!

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page